Background and Objectives:
The history of architecture is multifaceted, requiring analysis of various aspects, including the architect and their role across different PERIODs. The Safavid era, marked by significant transformations, is a pivotal PERIOD in Iranian architectural history. During this time, a form of art history emerged, centered around the names of artists. The heightened attention given to artists in Safavid writings raises the question: How is this reflected in the works of architects? A prominent manifestation of this trend is found in INSCRIPTIONS bearing the names of architects, which serve as a platform to showcase their elevated status as artists.
This research aims to examine the status of Safavid architects through the lens of their visual representation in INSCRIPTIONS, focusing on those that include the names of the architects themselves. A qualitative content analysis methodology will be employed, with data collected through documentary methods. By comparing the presence of architects’ names in Safavid INSCRIPTIONS to earlier PERIODs, significant changes in their placement and content will be explored. These changes encompass the manner in which architects are named, the types of attributes ascribed to them, and the inclusion of the names of royal patrons and government officials. These substantial shifts in the studied samples indicate an enhanced status of architects, mirroring the concurrent emergence of art historiography and a heightened focus on artists in written works.
Methodes:
This research employs a qualitative approach, with data gathered through documentary methods and analyzed using content analysis techniques. Initially, by examining INSCRIPTIONS containing architects’ names from the pre-Safavid PERIOD, their general characteristics are identified, and a notable example is analyzed in detail. Subsequently, by analyzing Safavid INSCRIPTIONS, changes in these characteristics are revealed, enabling a comparison with the earlier PERIOD. This comparison facilitates an interpretation of the increased status of the architect as an artist, as manifested in these INSCRIPTIONS.
Due to the abundance of Safavid buildings, a sampling method was employed, drawing from two primary sources:
A comprehensive list of ISLAMIC PERIOD buildings across Iran (Haji-Qassemi, K. 2015);
A focused selection of buildings from Isfahan, given its significance during the Safavid era (Honarfar, L. 1971).
Ultimately, 22 buildings with diverse functions and locations were identified as possessing INSCRIPTIONS bearing the architects’ names, forming the statistical population for this study.
Findings:
The analysis reveals that in ISLAMIC INSCRIPTIONS from the pre-Safavid PERIOD in Iran, architects’ names were typically mentioned at the end of foundation INSCRIPTIONS or in separate frames, often using the term “Amal” (work of) (Blair, S. 1998; Blair, S. S. 2015). Additionally, certain attributes indicating the profession or expressing humility were employed (Blair, S.1998). A notable example is the inscription of Qavam al-Din in the Goharshad Mosque (Babaie, S.2017), which is located separately at the bottom of the qibla iwan and accompanied by the term “Amal”, humility-indicating attributes, and the word “Tiyan” (builder or mason) (Dehkhoda, A.1994), without mentioning the name of the king or governmental patrons.
In contrast to the Timurid PERIOD, where INSCRIPTIONS primarily adorned buildings with limited functions, the Safavid era witnessed a diversity in the types of buildings bearing INSCRIPTIONS (Khosravi Bizhaem, F. 2017). The information for the samples in this study was obtained from (Honarfar, L. 1971; Babaie, S.2017; Khosravi Bizhaem, F. 2017; Eghtedari, A.1974; Javadi, S. 2008; Hoseyny, S. H.; Zarei, H., & Razani, M. 2020; Sharahi, E. 2013; Faiz Qomi, A. 1971; Karimi, B.1948; Grayeli, F.1995; Maherolnaqs, M. 1997; Mokhlesi, M. A. 1990; Mashkuti, N. 1966). The architects’ names in these samples are inscribed either separately or as a continuation of another inscription, with the texts presented in both Arabic and Persian, and some in poetic form.
Regarding placement, the architects’ names are situated in various parts of the buildings. The entrance has emerged as the most common location, with over half of the examples featuring the architect’s name prominently displayed at the main entrance. In nearly half of these cases, the architect’s name is found on the main inscription of the entrance portal or separately below, above, or at the end of it. The prevalence of such INSCRIPTIONS in significant locations like the entrance portal, compared to earlier PERIODs and the example of Qavam al-Din’s inscription, signifies a shift in the status of architects. In other instances, architects’ names are generally located in important areas of the building.
Three key points emerge from the analysis of inscription content. First, while the term “Amal” is still used in half of the examples, there is greater diversity in how architects are named compared to earlier PERIODs. Second, some architects’ names are accompanied by new types of attributes that signify an elevated status. Third, in three-quarters of the examples, the architects’ names are inscribed alongside or near the names of kings, governmental patrons, or both.
Conclusion
The analysis of INSCRIPTIONS containing architects’ names in the studied Safavid samples reveals significant changes compared to earlier PERIODs. These changes encompass both the placement and content of INSCRIPTIONS. Approximately half of the INSCRIPTIONS are situated in prominent locations, such as entrance portals, while the content of these INSCRIPTIONS exhibits variations in the naming of architects and the types of attributes used to describe them. Notably, new attributes have emerged that signify an elevated status for architects. Furthermore, three-quarters of these INSCRIPTIONS are placed alongside or near the names of kings or governmental patrons. The Masjid-e Jameh Abbasi and the Ali Mosque in Isfahan exemplify these changes, with architects’ names inscribed at the entrance portal, accompanied by attributes that indicate prestige and placed alongside the names of the Safavid king and governmental patron.